Every figure links to its source

What mobile OOH actually measured

This page exists because the category has a sourcing problem. Below are figures we can point at a published study for, and three widely-quoted numbers that do not survive being checked.

Measured against a control group

A cosmetics brand ran digital tops across Chicago, New York, Los Angeles and Miami. LoopMe surveyed audiences exposed to the campaign against a matched control. Firefly published the study; the figures below link to it.

+85%
Purchase intent

Exposed audience vs control

Firefly case study, measured by LoopMe

+44%
Brand recall

Same campaign, four markets

Firefly case study, measured by LoopMe

39.9M
Impressions delivered

Against a 30M target, 33% added value

Firefly case study, measured by LoopMe

2.8x
Unique reach growth

Moving OOH added to a stationary buy

Firefly and Reveal, The Amplifying Effect Part II, May 2026

Coca-Cola campaign on a Firefly 360 wrap + digital top vehicle in Las Vegas, 2024
Coca-ColaLas Vegas360 wrap + Digital top2024

Reach that stationary out-of-home cannot reproduce

Firefly has published two studies run with the measurement firm Reveal. The first, announced in October 2025, found that combining moving and stationary out-of-home lifted campaign performance by 50% to 100% against stationary alone. The follow-up white paper, The Amplifying Effect Part II, published in May 2026, found that adding the moving layer produced up to 2.8 times greater growth in unique reach relative to impression growth.

The mechanism is not complicated. A fixed board reaches the same commuters repeatedly. A fleet moving through a market keeps meeting people the board never passes, which converts wasted frequency into incremental reach.

Read the study announcement

Numbers we will not quote at you

These three appear on most vendor sites in this category, usually without a date. Here is what happens when you follow them back.

97% recall rate for mobile billboards

Traceable to an Arbitron outdoor study published in 2001.

It is quoted across the industry as current and often credited to the OAAA. It is neither. Twenty-five year old recall research from a pre-smartphone streetscape should be treated as directional at best.

40,000 to 70,000 daily impressions per vehicle

Widely repeated, rarely sourced with a method.

The range is plausible and matches operator modelling, but the number that matters is the one produced for your campaign, in your markets, from GPS logs against traffic counts. Ask any vendor quoting it which market and which model it came from.

Sub-$0.10 CPM for car top advertising

Depends entirely on how impressions are counted.

CPMs across this category vary by more than an order of magnitude depending on whether the count is gross opportunity-to-see or a modelled viewed-impression. Comparing two vendors quoting different methods tells you nothing.

The archive this site draws on

603
Brands documented

Coca-Cola, Adobe, Stripe, Shopify, Target, YSL, FIFA and 596 more

Firefly campaign archive, August 2026

3,783
Campaign photographs

Every frame a live campaign, not a render

Firefly campaign archive, August 2026

21
US markets

New York, Chicago, LA, San Francisco, Las Vegas and 16 more

Firefly campaign archive, August 2026

21
Vehicle formats

Digital tops, wraps, swarms, LED trucks, in-car, hologram

Firefly campaign archive, August 2026